Initial experience with 3D laparoscopic choledochal cyst (CDC) excision and hepatico-duodenostomy (HD) in 21 children.

INTRODUCTION: Minimal access surgery has gradually become the standard of care in the management of choledochal cysts (CDC). Laparoscopic management of CDC is a technically challenging procedure that requires advanced intracorporeal suturing skills, and hence, has a steep learning curve. Robotic surgery has the advantages of 3D vision, articulating hand instruments making suturing easy and thus is ideal. However, the non-availability, high costs and necessity for large-size ports are the major limiting factors for robotic procedures in the paediatric population. Use of 3D laparoscopy incorporates the advantage of 3D vision and at the same time allows the use of small-sized conventional laparoscopic instruments. With this background, we discuss our initial experience with the use of 3D laparoscopy using conventional hand instruments in CDC management. AIM: To study our initial experience in the management of CDC in paediatric patients with 3D laparoscopy in terms of feasibility and peri-operative details. MATERIALS AND METHOD: All patients under 12 years of age treated for choledochal cyst in a period of initial 2 years were retrospectively analysed. Demographic parameters, clinical presentation, intra-operative time, blood loss, post-operative events and follow-up were studied. RESULTS: The total number of patients were 21. The mean age was 5.3 years with female preponderance. Abdominal pain was the most common presenting symptom. All patients could be completed laparoscopically. No patient needed conversion to open procedure or re-exploration. The average blood loss was 26.67 ml. None of the patients required a blood transfusion. One patient developed a minor leak postoperatively and was managed conservatively. CONCLUSION: 3D laparoscopic management of CDC in the paediatric age group is safe and feasible. It offers the advantages of depth perception aiding intracorporeal suturing, with the use of small-sized instruments. It is thus a 'bridging the gap' asset between conventional laparoscopy and robotic surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Treatment study level IV.

EUS-Guided Choledocho-duodenostomy Using Lumen Apposing Stent Versus ERCP With Covered Metallic Stents in Patients With Unresectable Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (DRA-MBO Trial).

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Several studies have compared primary endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with insertion of metal stents in unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO) and the results were conflicting. The aim of the current study was to compare the outcomes of the procedures in a large-scale study. METHODS: This was a multicenter international randomized controlled study. Consecutive patients admitted for obstructive jaundice due to unresectable MDBO were recruited. Patients were randomly allocated to receive EUS-guided choledocho-duodenostomy (ECDS) or ERCP for drainage. The primary outcome was the 1-year stent patency rate. Other outcomes included technical success, clinical success, adverse events, time to stent dysfunction, reintervention rates, and overall survival. RESULTS: Between January 2017 and February 2021, 155 patients were recruited (ECDS 79, ERCP 76). There were no significant differences in 1-year stent patency rates (ECDS 91.1% vs ERCP 88.1%, P = .52). The ECDS group had significantly higher technical success (ECDS 96.2% vs ERCP 76.3%, P < .001), whereas clinical success was similar (ECDS 93.7% vs ERCP 90.8%, P = .559). The median (interquartile range) procedural time was significantly shorter in the ECDS group (ECDS 10 [5.75-18] vs ERCP 25 [14-40] minutes, P < .001). The rate of 30-day adverse events (P = 1) and 30-day mortality (P = .53) were similar. CONCLUSION: Both procedures could be options for primary biliary drainage in unresectable MDBO. ECDS was associated with higher technical success and shorter procedural time then ERCP. Primary ECDS may be preferred when difficult ERCPs are anticipated. This study was registered to Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03000855.

Study of Operative Events and Time Requirement of Hepaticoduodenostomy for the Treatment of Type I Choledochal Cyst- the Experience at BSMMU Hospital.

Of all varieties, Type I Choledochal cyst causing saccular or fusiform dilatation of the extra-hepatic biliary ductal system is the commonest (90.0 - 95.0%). Its presentations vary. To restore the continuity of the extra-hepatic biliary tract after excision of type I Choledochal cyst, surgeons have few alternatives to use, with their advantages and disadvantages. Roux en-Y Hepatico-jejunostomy (RYHJ) has been very popular and long studied standard surgical treatment for type I Choledochal cyst. But now Hepatico-duodenostomy (HD) is also being practiced and studied in different centers all over the world for the treatment of the same disease. For the last five years, we, at Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh, have been using Hepatico-duodenostomy as preferred anastomotic option in treating type I Choledochal cyst. Here, we are presenting our experience at BSMMU Hospital, regarding operative events and time requirement of Hepaticoduodenostomy for the treatment of type I Choledochal cyst and, to show whether this procedure can be safely practiced, producing acceptable results. It is a retrospective document study, from January 2013 to December 2017, at BSMMU Hospital, on forty two, MRCP confirmed type I Choledochal cyst patients of pediatric age. Patients' particulars, history, physical examination, investigations (including MRCP confirmation), assessment, surgical plan were collected from relevant medical records and documented in duly coded individual data collection sheet maintaining standard privacy protocol. Information regarding presentations, operative findings and procedural events including per-operative mortality, injury to the vital structures during operation, conversion to RYHJ, operative time (minutes), blood loss and transfusion requirements (ml) of Heaticoduodenostomy for type I Choledochal cyst, were specially searched for. There was no operative mortality. None of these patients required per-operative blood transfusion. Nor there was any inadvertent injury to the adjacent structures. The mean operative time required for Hepaticoduodenostomy was 88 minutes with a range of 75 to 125 minutes. Through this study, at BSMMU Hospital, operative events and time requirement of Hepatico-duodenostomy for treating type I Choledochal cyst, was found to be yielding acceptable results, for safe practice.

Feeding gastrostomy and duodenostomy using the round ligament of the liver versus conventional feeding jejunostomy after esophagectomy: a meta-analysis.

Esophageal cancer patients require enteral nutritional support after esophagectomy. Conventional feeding enterostomy to the jejunum (FJ) is occasionally associated with small bowel obstruction because the jejunum is fixed to the abdominal wall. Feeding through an enteral feeding tube inserted through the reconstructed gastric tube (FG) or the duodenum (FD) using the round ligament of the liver have been suggested as alternatives. This meta-analysis aimed to compare short-term outcomes between FG/FD and FJ. Studies published prior to May 2022 that compared FG or FD with FJ in cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy were identified via electronic literature search. Meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model to calculate Odds Ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Five studies met inclusion criteria to yield a total of 1687 patients. Compared with the FJ group, the odds of small bowel obstruction (OR 0.09; 95% CI, 0.02-0.33), catheter site infection (OR 0.18; 95% CI, 0.06-0.51) and anastomotic leakage (OR 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32-0.89) were lower for the FG/FD group. Odds of pneumonia, recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, chylothorax and hospital mortality did not significantly differ between the groups. The length of hospital stay was shorter for the FG/FD group (median difference, -10.83; 95% CI, -18.55 to -3.11). FG and FD using the round ligament of the liver were associated with lower odds of small bowel obstruction, catheter site infection and anastomotic leakage than FJ in esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy.

Tube Duodenostomy to Treat Large Duodenal Perforation: Our Experience and Literature Review.

Background: Duodenal perforation is a life-threatening condition and ideal approaches for the management of duodenal perforations are nowadays unclear, so numerous variables must be considered. Peptic ulcer disease is the most common disease determining a duodenal perforation, however, there may be other less common causes. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all the patients who presented at our Division of General Surgery for a Duodenal Perforation, from September 2018 to December 2019. We focused on patients requiring a tube duodenostomy. Five patients were included in this study. Results: Five patients suffering from a duodenal perforation were analyzed and their data collected. All patients were treated with tube duodenostomy, pyloric exclusion and omega loop gastro-enteroanastomosis. The duodenostomy was removed four weeks after surgery. All patients suffered postsurgical complications ranging from wound infection to pneumonitis; the incidence of severe complications was greater in the older patients. We did not record any deaths four months after the operation. Conclusions: The tube duodenostomy is an old and dated procedure but simple to implement, which may require an increase in post-operative hospitalization, but which subsists as an effective and safe way to treat patients in critical conditions.

The Berne-Donovan technique for diverticulization of a severe lateral non-traumatic duodenal fistula.

BACKGROUND: The duodenal «diverticulization¼ is a surgical technique described by Berne and colleagues in 1968 for the treatment of combined duodenal pancreatic injuries. It consisted of closure of the duodenal injury by suture and tube duodenostomy, gastric antrectomy with end-to-side isoperistaltic Billroth II gastrojejunostomy, and abdominal drainage. As evidenced from the literature in few reports, this technique has also been adopted for lateral duodenal lacerations in non traumatic conditions. Most biliary disease may be responsible for duodenal injury. CASE PRESENTATION: Herein, we describe the application of this emergency technique for the treatment of a wide lateral duodenal laceration discovered intra-operatively during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. A comprehensive critical review of the different surgical methods proposed for duodenal protection in case of severe duodenal lesions has been performed and discussed. CONCLUSION: Duodenal injuries represent a challenging condition, especially for surgeons with limited experience in this field. The key-message of this report is to consider emergency surgical techniques in difficult unexpected intra-operative situations which may occur during routine surgical practice. KEY WORDS: Duodenal diverticulization, Duodenal fistula, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Surgical repair.

Duodenopancreatectomía por adenocarcinoma ductal de páncreas en ancianos. ¿Podemos asumirla con seguridad? / Cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma in the elderly. Can we do it safely?

Introducción: La cirugía y la quimioterapia han aumentado la supervivencia de los pacientes con neoplasias pancreáticas. La disminución de la morbimortalidad postoperatoria y el aumento de la esperanza de vida han ampliado las indicaciones de la duodenopancreatectomía cefálica (DPC), aunque sigue siendo controvertida en la población geriátrica. Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo sobre una base de datos prospectiva, de pacientes con adenocarcinoma ductal de páncreas sometidos a una DPC entre 2007-2018. El objetivo principal fue analizar la morbimortalidad y supervivencia asociada a la DPC en pacientes≥75 años (ancianos). Resultados: Se incluyeron 79 pacientes, 21 de ellos mayores de 75 años (27%); dentro de este grupo el 23,9% tenían más de 80 años. El ASA de ambos grupos fue similar. Los pacientes≥75años requirieron más transfusiones. No se observaron diferencias en el tiempo operatorio, aunque en los ancianos se realizaron más resecciones vasculares (26 vs. 8,7%; p=0,037).La morbilidad fue mayor en los ancianos (61,9 vs. 46,6%), aunque sin diferencias. Los≥75años presentaron más complicaciones no quirúrgicas (33,3%; p=0,050) siendo la neumonía la más frecuente. La mortalidad postoperatoria fue superior en los≥75años (9 vs. 0%; p=0,017), constituyendo la resección venosa un factor de riesgo (p=0,01). La supervivencia global y la supervivencia libre de enfermedad no mostraron diferencias significativas en ambos grupos. Conclusiones: Los pacientes ancianos presentaron una mayor mortalidad postoperatoria y más complicaciones no quirúrgicas. La supervivencia no mostró diferencias, por lo que, con una adecuada selección de pacientes, la edad no debe constituirse por sí misma como una contraindicación para la DPC(AU).

Introduction: Surgery and chemotherapy have increased the survival of pancreatic cancer. The decrease in postoperative morbidity and mortality and increase in life expectancy, has expanded the indications por cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PDC), although it remains controversial in the geriatric population. Methods: Retrospective study on a prospective database of patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of pancreas who underwent PDC between 2007-2018.The main objective was to analyse the morbidity-mortality and survival associated with PDC in patients≥75 years (elderly). Results: 79 patients were included, 21 of them older than 75 years (27%); within this group, 23.9% were over 80 years old. The ASA of both groups was similar. Patients≥75 years required more transfusions. No differences in operating time were observed, although more vascular resection were performed in the elderly (26 vs. 8.7%; P=.037). Morbidity was higher in the elderly (61.9 vs. 46.6%), although without differences. Patients aged≥75 years had more non-surgical complications (33.3%, P=.050), being pneumonia the most frequent. Postoperative mortality was higher in the≥75 years (9 vs. 0%; P=.017). The overall survival and disease-free survival did not show significant differences in both groups. Conclusions: Elderly patients had higher postoperative mortality and more non-surgical complications. Survival did not show differences, so with an adequate selection of patients, age should not be considered itself as a contraindication for PDC(AU).

Neonate with Congenital Duodenal Obstruction and Ectopic Hepatic Parenchyma.

BackgroundThe presence of hepatic parenchyma at ectopic locations is infrequently reported in neonatal age. Case details: A male neonate presented with clinical signs and symptoms of duodenal obstruction. At exploration, an annular pancreas was found as the causative factor and he underwent a Kimura's duodeno-duodenostomy. A pedicled cyst was attached to the stomach's greater curvature, was excised, and histologically was a mesothelial-lined cyst with ectopic liver, complete with bile ducts, in the cyst wall. Conclusion: Ectopic liver tissue may be clinically silent and found within the wall of a mesothelial cyst. Long-term complications of this ectopic tissue are not known.

Management of Duodeno-Jejunal Flexure Transection after Blunt Trauma - A Modified Approach.

Background: Small bowel injuries are infrequent after blunt trauma and typically affect fixed segment. Untimely management of such injuries, results in high-output entero-cutaneous fistula which increases morbidity and mortality. Treatment of duodeno-jejunal flexure transection has been traditionally done by pyloric exclusion with gastrojejunostomy, but more recent evidence suggests that end-to-end anastomosis or primary closure may be equally effective in which duodeno-jejunal anastomosis is protected via an external tube duodenostomy. Objective: The objective of the study is to provide a modification to the technique of management of duodeno-jejunal flexure injury, avoiding external tube duodenostomy. Material and Methods: Patients admitted from July 1, 2015 to June 1, 2018 were identified and examined for duodeno-jejunal flexure transection. Non-accidental injury cases were excluded. Results: In the study period, a total of 10 patients were admitted with duodeno-jejunal flexure transection. All cases were admitted 24 hours after the injury and presented with shock. After fluid resuscitation and investigations, they were taken for urgent laparotomy. The whole of duodenum was mobilised, the transected ends were debrided and end-to-end duodenojejunal anastomosis was performed in two-layer fashion. An 18-French Nasojejunal (NJ) tube was placed beyond the anastomosis, and an 18-French nasogastric (NG) tube was placed in the stomach for gastric decompression. A feeding jejunostomy was performed in all cases. Both NG and NJ tubes were removed after bowel movements started and FJ was removed on first follow up. There was no incidence of duodenum related complications, and all were doing well on follow up. Discussion and conclusion: Placing the nasojejunal and nasogastric tube eliminates the need for duodenostomy and gastrostomy, respectively. This method protects the duodeno-jejunal anastomosis and decreases the incidence of duodenum-related complications.

Management of an Aortoenteric Fistula in a Patient with End Stage Renal and Liver Disease, Prior Endovascular Aortic Repair With Type II Endoleak.

Primary aortoenteric fistula (AEF) is an uncommon but life-threatening condition. We present a case of primary AEF in an octogenarian with previous endovascular aortic repair, type II endoleak and end stage liver and renal disease. He was successfully treated with accessory renal artery ligation, duodenojejunostomy, aneurysm sac debridement and irrigation and closure of the aneurysm sac over a drain. The patient made an excellent recovery and was discharged on POD #7, with no complications noted after over a year of follow up. This approach may represent a valuable option to manage primary AEF versus open endograft explant, particularly in severely ill patients.

Association between Postoperative Opioid Requirements and the Duration of Smoking Cessation in Male Smokers after Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy with Gastroduodenostomy.

Smoking is clinically associated with high postoperative pain scores and increased perioperative analgesic requirements. However, the association between the duration of smoking cessation and postoperative opioid requirements remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the association between the duration of smoking cessation and postoperative opioid requirements. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 144 male patients who received intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with gastroduodenostomy. All patients were divided into three groups: G0, nonsmoker; G1, smoker who quit smoking within 1 month preoperatively; G2, smoker who quit smoking over 1 month preoperatively. Analgesic use, pain intensity, and IV PCA side effects were assessed up to postoperative day 2. As the duration of smoking cessation increased, the amount of postoperative opioid consumption decreased (ß = -0.08; 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.11 to -0.04; P < 0.001). The total postoperative opioid requirements in G1 were significantly higher than those in G0 and G2 (G0, 75.5 ± 15.9 mg; G1, 94.6 ± 20.5 mg; and G2, 79.9 ± 19.4 mg (P < 0.001)). A multivariate regression analysis revealed that G1 was independently associated with increased postoperative opioid requirements (ß = 12.80; 95% CI, 5.81-19.80; P < 0.001). Consequently, male patients who had ceased smoking within 1 month of undergoing a laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with gastroduodenostomy had higher postoperative opioid use than patients who had ceased smoking for more than 1 month and nonsmokers.

SMA syndrome: management perspective with laparoscopic duodenojejunostomy and long-term results.

BACKGROUND: Superior mesentery artery syndrome (SMAS) is a rare vasculo-anatomic occlusive pathologic entity for which a period of conservative medical management is advocated with surgery reserved for nonresponsive cases. We present our management plan that entails a single admission approach and complete rendering of medical and surgical treatment to the patient on a background of the socioeconomic and cultural trends prevalent in this geographic region. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 22 cases of SMAS admitted in our health care system who underwent a period of preoperative conditioning followed by laparoscopic duodenojejunostomy from September 2009 to June 2019 was performed. Patients were followed up at regular intervals. RESULTS: The mean follow-up of the cohort was 41.2 months (2-108 months). The median length of stay was 6 days. The mean postoperative stay was 4.13 days. A subgroup of six patients who had severe physiological depletion required a period of preoperative optimisation. Five of the 22 (22.7%) patients suffered from postoperative complications in the form of delayed return of bowel functions. None of the patients had complications more than Clavien-Dindo grade 2 with no mortality. Long-term data are available for 19 patients (86.3%) which showed no symptom recurrence. CONCLUSION: Management of SMAS that entails an antecedent medical therapy followed by surgery can be accomplished in a single admission with good to excellent results in the intermediate and long-term follow-up. Physiologically depleted patients do require a period of intensive preconditioning but on long-term follow-up, they have excellent results.

Robotic duodenal (D3) resection with Roux-en-Y duodenojejunostomy reconstruction for large GIST tumor: Step by step with video.

BACKGROUND: Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are uncommon, making up only 3-5% of all GISTs. [1,2] Historically, the treatment of choice for duodenal GIST tumors was pancreaticoduodenectomy. [3]Currently, newer surgical intervention methods including local resection via laparotomy, endoscopic resection, and robotic resection are feasible. When doing a local resection, the defect can be closed either primarily or via a Roux-en-Y duodenojejunostomy. [3] Case presentation: Our patient is a 64-year- old female who presented initially with shortness of breath and was found to have a pulmonary embolism. She then developed upper GI bleeding from anticoagulation and was found to have an ulcerated GIST tumor in the anti-mesenteric border of the third portion of the duodenum (D3). Initial surgery was postponed due to high pulmonary artery pressure from the pulmonary embolism. The patient underwent argon beam coagulation of the bleeding mass to control the bleeding, followed by localized radiotherapy plus Gleevec. Unfortunately, the tumor grew in size during follow-up. The patient was then taken to the OR for a robot-assisted partial duodenal resection (D3) with Roux-en-Y duodenojejunostomy to reconstruct the large defect. She did well post operatively and her final pathology showed a GIST tumor, c-kit and DOG1 positive, 3.5 cm in size, with negative margins. CONCLUSION: Robotic duodenal resection is a new technique currently being used to resect duodenal GIST tumors. Our video demonstrates the feasibility of D3 partial resection with Roux-en-Y duodenojejunostomy. Duodenal GIST tumor robotic resection offers both decreased morbidity and adequate oncologic outcomes.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided cholecystostomy for resection of gallbladder polyps with lumen-apposing metal stent.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the routine method to treat gallbladder polyps. Nowadays, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided cholecystostomy as a bridge for per-oral transmural endoscopic resection of gallbladder polyps is introduced because preservation of gallbladder is increasingly getting attention. The aim of our study was to evaluate the approach in the treatment of patients with gallbladder polyps and symptomatic gallstones.EUS-guided cholecystostomy with the placement of a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) was performed for those patients with accompanying gallbladder polyps and symptomatic gallstones. Several days after the cholecystostomy with LAMS, a gastroscope was introduced into the gallbladder to remove gallbladder polyps.All patients were successfully performed with the procedures of EUS-guided cholecystoduodenostomy (n = 3) or cholecystogastrostomy (n = 1) and endoscopic resection of gallbladder polyps. One patient experienced severe peritonitis. During the follow-up at 3 months, 1 patient was performed with laparoscopic cholecystectomy because ultrasonography examination showed the reappeared gallstones. No stone recurrence was found in other patients. During the follow-up of 3 to 15 months, no polyp recurrence was found in all the patients.The approach is novel for performing EUS-guided gallbladder fistulization, which can subsequently allow procedures of per-oral transmural endoscopic resection of gallbladder polyps to avoid cholecystectomy in the patients with gallbladder polyps and gallstones. However, further studies are needed before clinical recommendation because of the complications and stone recurrence.

Durability and outcome of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticoduodenostomy using a fully covered metal stent for segregated right intrahepatic duct dilatation.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Segregated right intrahepatic duct dilatation (IHD) results from complete obstruction of the biliary tract proximal to the hilar level. We aimed to evaluate long-term efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) hepaticoduodenostomy (HDS) in segregated right IHD. METHODS: Consecutive patients who had undergone EUS-guided HDS with a fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) in an academic tertiary center were recruited. All patients had segregated right hepatic duct and failed drainage by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Demographic data, endoscopic findings, procedure details, and outcome data were extracted from a prospectively maintained database. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2017, there were 35 patients who had undergone EUS-guided HDS with a median follow-up duration of 169 (3-2091) days. Malignancy accounted for 71.4% of the ductal segregation, followed by surgical complication (17.1%). Technical and clinical success rate was 97.1% and 80%, respectively. Early adverse event (AE) happened in seven patients (20%), two of them required endoscopic reintervention, and no percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) or surgery was performed because of AE. The median stent patency duration was 331 (3-1202) days. The median duration of fistula tract keeping was 1280 (3-1280) days. There was no significant difference in terms of patency rate with respect to whether the underlying pathology was benign or malignant (P = 0.776). EUS-guided HDS for right posterior sectional duct segregation was associated with higher 3-month stent patency rate when compared with right anterior sectional duct (79.1% vs 38.1%, P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided HDS with an FCSEMS appears to be a safe and effective treatment as a viable alternative option to PTBD after failed ERCP. It creates a durable and reliable fistula tract for permanent access to an isolated ductal system, and this application deserves more attention.

Aortoduodenal Fistula After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

Aortoduodenal fistula after endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm is a very rare but life-threatening complication. Herein, we describe 4 cases of aortoduodenal fistula diagnosed at 15 to 78 months after the index aortic intervention, all successfully treated by surgery. All patients underwent primary repair of the duodenal wall, creation of tube duodenostomy, stent graft removal, and in situ reconstruction using a rifampicin-soaked prosthesis. Patients received prolonged antibiotic treatment for at least 2 months postoperatively, and all were free of recurrent infection at follow-up. Prompt and appropriate surgical intervention is required to effectively manage this condition.